Talk:Sorbs
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sorbs article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sorbs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050831095937/http://www.domowina.sorben.com/index.htm to http://www.domowina.sorben.com/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
genetics
[edit]I think that the section on genetics is still a bit confusing. I think the section needs to be more accessible (not everyone who reads this page is going to be an expert on genetics). Also, I think the significance can get lost in all the technical talk. Rufus the Unqualified (talk) 00:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Contradictions Everywhere, Written Very Poorly
[edit]There are huge issues and a lack of citations in regards to the supposed demolition of schools in the German states of Saxony and Brandenburg. There's also two paragraphs with different arguments in close vicinity to one another. Were they repressed by the Nazis, or were they free from any repression by the Nazis? This is not cohesive.
Why are there two of these? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wends
Why are the narratives completely different? Hello?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.150.113.227 (talk) 19:14, 2 April 2025 (UTC)